Saturday, August 25, 2007

Bad Running

My first run after hitting the thirty-two mark was pleasant. It was one of those runs where you wonder why you're not getting tired and have to throttle the urge to over exert yourself.  I thought to myself it was a good omen.

Flash forward to Wednesday this week and I ambled my two miles like a wounded animal.  It seemed as though every joint and limb protested against any movement beyond a lackadaisical walk. And walk I did - as much as I hate stopping, time and experience have taught me that it's better to keep a marathon runner's mentality than that of a sprinter. Alexander the Great chose his horses first for endurance, not speed.

And even though it's the triumph I'm more inclined to celebrate myself in a blog post entitled "Thirty-two and sprinting" or something shameless like it, it's the second run that was more important.  Bad Running is good: it's those moments when you develop the perseverance for the running that is easy.

I was talking to a friend about The Happiness Project, a blog I ran across and how the author's aim is to be "happy" all the time. I'd gone through some sadness about whether or not I'd ever get to see Berlin and told her of a suggested exercise of writing down a few things one should be happy about to pick up one's mood. It was an idea to which M was a little cold: is it healthy to be "happy" all the time?

The notion stopped me dead in my tracks. Is it healthy to be happy, or to try to be happy, all the time?

Down time makes me appreciate what's good. It's the contrast that lets one understand the pleasure of being happy.  But unlike that feeling of embracing a bad run, my usual reaction to it is to try to bounce back in some way: focusing on work, a phone call, my aggregator, an old essay, or the tube.  Or running.

And even though it seems to me that unhealthy distraction is a bad tactic, it's a bit daunting to think about just letting an "unhappy" or otherwise disconcerting emotion wash over while you directly confront it.

The question still stands as something to be pondered: is it healthy to try to be "happy" all the time?

#    Comments [1] |
Wednesday, August 29, 2007 3:51:39 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I don't think it's healthy - or possible - to try to be happy all the time. But I think that you also have to decide what you think the definition of "happiness" is and what you think its purpose is. To me, happiness is more circumstantial and depends on a thing or experience. dictionary.com says "delighted, pleased, or glad, as over a particular thing." For example, one day at work I might have too many patients and deal with rude doctors, and I am not "happy" that day. But the next day I might have great patients, a smooth day, and get home on time. That day, I come home with a whole different attitude, But when I look back, my overall opinion of my job is the same because each day combines with the next, and I end up with sort of an average. In all honesty, I think happiness is kind of flaky. (That's not to say that it's bad or doesn't serve a purpose, however.)

The thing I strive for is joy all the time. Joy is more constant, and not dependent on circumstance. It's a state of mind and a state of being. It's an overall outlook and thinking of every minute in life having a purpose. It's an outlook more than a feeling.

That's my two cents. Maybe it's all semantics, anyway. :-)
Kristin
Comments are closed.